It is undeniable that there have been massive increases in the average material quality of living since the agricultural and industrial production revolutions of the 18th-19th centuries, especially leavened by Anglo-Saxon free market philosophy. Medicine, private and public entertainments, and engineering are among the chief benefits we enjoy today. But while we disencumber ourselves of pain, toil, and anxiety, another undeniable fact has emerged: our global environment pays a steep price, in often unexpected ways.
The article asks the most pertinent question: how well suited is our current free-market economy, even our global infrastructure, to the health and longevity of our natural environment? Can we continue to produce this quantity of goods with the qualities we are accustomed to, or will we have to innovate a less ecologically destructive marketplace?
The Bekaa Valley in northern Lebanon, first home of Shiite group Hezbollah, has seen Shiite-Sunni clashes as militants and insurgents from across the Syrian border find a foothold there. The threat of war looms.
Can civilian resignation and fear be overcome in favor of peace, or will sectarian hatred continue to polarize these communities to the point of senselessly re-enacting bloodshed both current and past?
NATO intercepts of Russian military aircraft over European airspace has tripled since 2013.
With prolonged Russian involvement in Crimea, the continuing possibility of compromised intelligence due to the Snowden affair, and Russia’s geographically anxious, expansionist character, is the Kremlin testing its fences – or ours?
Julian Assange of WikiLeaks and Eric Schmidt of Google “locked horns” over the shape and purpose of freedom on the Internet, elaborating opposite views on what this freedom meant, how it should be achieved, and what it was ultimately for.
Is the worldwide web best for humanity if it is left unfettered, uncensored, and transparent, benefiting from the exchange of ideas and resources between free people – disregarding any societal blowback – or do we need a strong, paternalistic apparatus to purposely sculpt it for the uses of a single political agenda ostensibly – but not necessarily – invested in freedom and democracy?
The cultural epicenter of Western Europe reels at its youths’ poor taste and random acts of violence.